Bhopal, India has the second
largest number of tobacco users (275 million or 35% of all adults in
India) in the world – of these at least
10 lakh die every year from tobacco related diseases. Tobacco-use imposes
enormous health and economic costs on the country.
There is certainly an overarching consensus that goods that
are harmful to society categorized as “sin” such as tobacco be taxed at the
highest rate under GST as recommended in the Chief Economic Advisor report which Proposed 26 % sin rate on tobacco to negatively impact revenue and public
health
h seeks a 40% GST sin rate
on all tobacco products including cigarettes, bidis and chewing tobacco. The GST council meeting that concluded on
October 20th proposed a much lower 26% GST sin rate which would have significant impact on the revenue as
well as the health of our nation, both of which require serious consideration. The rationale for a sin tax
is twofold, to pay for the damage caused to society by products like tobacco,
and secondly, to increase the price and reduce their usage. A 26% rate would defeat both purposes – it
would significantly reduce current revenues from tobacco and would actually
make tobacco products more affordable and encourage consumption, especially
among vulnerable population including children and youth.
According to Dr. Rijo John, Assistant Professor, IIT Jodhpur,
“Compared to a GST Sin rate of 40%,
imposing a 26% Sin rate would reduce total tobacco tax revenue by almost one
fifth (17%, or roughly Rs.10, 510 crores) even if the government retains the
current excise on tobacco products post GST. Clearly, 26% Sin rate will be well
below the rate required to maintain a revenue neutral position for tobacco and
will significantly reduce tax burden on ALL tobacco products since the existing
average VAT rates themselves are higher than 26% on most tobacco products.”
Tobacco-use imposes enormous health and economic costs on
the country. The total direct and indirect cost of diseases attributable
to tobacco use was a staggering Rupees 1.04 lakh crore ($17 billion) in 2011 or
1.16% of India’s GDP.
“A much lower GST rate
would make all tobacco products even more affordable to youth and other
vulnerable populations, leading to the impact of the tobacco epidemic becoming
more severe driving up health care costs and resulting in productivity losses.
This will certainly lead to an increased number of fatalities per year, which
is not a good news for any country. I firmly believe & urge that the
government should tax the tobacco products at very high rate to ensure it
discourages mass consumption” Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Oncologist, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai
Approximately 48 percent of men
and 20 percent of women consume tobacco (35 percent of the adult population
overall) - of these at least 10
lakh are dying each year from tobacco related diseases. Bidis comprise 48
percent of the tobacco market, chewing tobacco 38 percent and cigarettes 14
percent so it is evident that bidis account for a significant portion of those
deaths.
According to,
Dr. Lalit Shrivastava , State Patron of Voice of Tobacco Victims (VoTV), “The current tobacco tax differentiates significantly between various
forms of tobacco products (such as bidis, smokeless tobacco and cigarettes). Continuing to
sell cheap, virtually tax-exempt bidis to the underprivileged, even in the new
GST system, will ensure that the poor continue to be trapped in vicious cycle
of poverty and ill health, exacerbated by affordability and addiction which
causes them to spend more on tobacco and less on food, healthcare and
education. We would urge the central and state governments to tax all forms of
tobacco including bidis at 40 percent under GST regime, to insulate the
population from its ill effects.”
“With 85% of smoked
tobacco being consumed as Bidis, a large percentage of the 10 lakh tobacco
related deaths occur because of bidi use. Therefore, treating bidis under the
highest category for sin products to attract maximum tax would not only save
the lives of lakhs of poor Indians but would also help reduce the overwhelming
health disparities between various strata of society. The government should
treat such issues on a priority basis & ensure that there is no distinction
made amongst all forms of tobacco and are taxed at highest possible rates so as
to keep our most
vulnerable populations away from falling prey to it”
"I lost my husband at a young age due to
tobacco. I am suffering because of a wrong 'personal choice' made by him. I and
my two daughters were not only pained emotionally but devastated financially.
How can even anyone think of giving any kind of subsidy to this factory of
widows and orphans? Government should not be seen supporting an industry that
destroys 10 lac families each year for amassing vulgar profits.” Mrs. Sumitra
Pednekar, wife of Maharashtra's Former Home and Labour Minister Satish Pednekar , who died of
oral cancer.
Based on current scenarios under consideration, a 40% Sin rate combined with the existing
excise tax and top-up state rights to tax tobacco appears to be the best
scenario for public health and revenue. This
will not only help us maintain the current tax burden on tobacco, and will
prevent more Indians from falling prey to life-threatening diseases and caught
in a cycle of perpetual poverty!
एक टिप्पणी भेजें